Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
posts library
-
▼
2007
(264)
-
▼
May
(28)
- 'Walk the Walk'
- 'Morning Joe'
- 'till it's over, over there'
- Ugliness mars beauty celebration
- The silence is deafening
- 'Enquiring minds want to know'
- Remember pop tests?
- Poets' Corner
- 'Looking down on creation'
- How the gingrich stole the election
- Our Don Imus DTs
- 'They shoot horses, don't they?'
- WH muzzles watchdog board
- 'DC Idol'
- Scandal redux
- George who?
- Angst and awakening
- Press in a Catch-22
- The duplicity of Rupert Murdoch
- '... no longer any credibility'
- Game of gossip or good news?
- Spellbound
- Numbers crunching
- GOP: 'Win one for The Gipper'
- 'Let's play oddball'
- Gather ye soundbites while ye may
- 'his hour upon the stage'
- A teen's touching letter
-
▼
May
(28)
dreams
A warm welcome to the naturally curious, the politically engaged and constant learners. I am a retired newspaper editor with a fickle foe, retinitis pigmentosa, or RP. While my sense of sight is waning, my "vision" is not, and, by God, I can still see my dreams!
simply ...
- B.J.
- South Carolina, United States
- constant learner
traffic reports
fair use notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of current issues. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
2 comments:
Sir Cumspect and I disagree on Don Imus. But I couldn't put my disagreement into the proper context.
This morning I read an editorial In the WP saying that the Wall Street Journal is a national treasure and should be saved from the hands of Robert Murdoch. Then I thought of my difference with Sir Cumspect over Imus. Though I admire the Wall Street Journal for its news and business coverage I generally detest its editorials. They are mostly mean-spirited and ultra right-wing. So I avoid the WSJ. Well, I was thinking, that's how I think of Imus. Though he generally does good work, as Sir C. points out, I detest his editorial.
I have to give Joe credit for acknowledging Imus. I think that might be a clue that Imus is on his way back to his old spot on MSNBC. It's a known fact that none that have been on there, since the departure of Imus, are capable of filling Imus' shoes.
So he's a burley ole man, but he knows how to be generous from that great big ole heart he has. He doesn't claim to be the most couth
creature on earth.
But look at those who do: Falwell, Robertson, GW Bush & BushCo, Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly and the Fox Fanatics, Rush Limbaugh, et al.
Me, I'll take Imus anytime over that bunch from Barfville! Imus might not always get his humor correct, but he doesn't spread hatred over the airways.
'Nuff said!
Post a Comment