(Reprinted with permission from Craig Crawford, Congressional Quarterly.)
Yes We Can WHAT?
By Craig Crawford, Congressional Quarterly February 18, 2008 6:00 AM
The news media’s long-awaited scrubbing of Barack Obama’s concrete plans for governing has begun and, not surprisingly, it doesn't take long. The Democratic presidential contender’s famously inspirational speeches offer little sustenance for wonks.
In a rare and much-heralded policy address last week, Obama attempted to get specific on economics but the details turned out to be so reminiscent of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s proposals that an aide to Republican nominee-to-be John McCain stepped in to cry foul. “He basically took Clinton's words and Clinton's policies and called them his own,” McCain economic advisor Kevin Hassett said.
Obama’s supporters and advisers refer pesky policy inquiries to the campaign Web site, but it is difficult to connect the dots between this internet data dump and a candidate whose public comments reveal little evidence that he has read it himself. As Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, an Obama fan, concluded after examining the Web site, “I'm still puzzled about where to locate Obama on this policy map.”
No one expects Obama to use every opportunity to wade through the policy thicket that Clinton seems to enjoy navigating in her often mind-numbing stump speeches. The Illinois senator apparently intends to be a motivational president who stays above the fray. But on the stump he provides little guidance to the occasional voter who might be curious about exactly what he would do as president.
Politically speaking, it is probably true that Obama does not need to sweat the policy details. He has so far made it to the brink of success in the Democratic race without specifics. Instead, his admiring crowds appear content to chant “Yes We Can” without bothering to finish the sentence. –end-
For more of “Craig Crawford’s Trail Mix:” LINK
NEXT POST: ‘They are snakes’
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Frodo likes to believe that among the many things that we "can" is to judge a man by the content of his character.
Whether we do or not is another story.
I ordinarily would be very suspicious of someone who didn't make himself clear. But some of the things he's made himself clear on do appeal to me. And I'm so burned with GW not being flexible that I find not having it all worked out to be a good thing because we are not in these situations yet. I do wish for a person who could think and have deplomacy and make things go right. And not be riveted on a former plan. True, he may not be the one, but hope springs eternal. And when the opposition seems not so flexible--it's like sun on sunburn after all these years of GW. E
Post a Comment