Alternate title: “Déjà vu all over again.”
This holiday season saw a couple of my traditions bite the dust. Couldn’t see the ball drop in Times Square, only to find out later it was the 100th anniversary of the event. Bummer. On New Year’s Day I opted to give up on the Tournament of Roses parade – decidedly not a listening event!
Serendipity! A channel change led me to CNN’s all-day “Ballot Bowl,” a chance to get to know all the candidates – live from Iowa and New Hampshire eateries and living rooms, one-on-one and up close and personal. Kudos to CNN for the outstanding coverage.
I came away with a firm conviction that the more I hear from Gov. Mike Huckabee the scarier he gets. Make certain you know exactly where this guy aims to take our country before you are charmed by his folksy, faith-based manner.
Now, to the subject of this post:
Because the TV was on CNN I caught a couple of hours of “The Situation Room” with Wolf Blitzer (TRANSCRIPT), staying with him because he repeatedly teased a story which holds my interest.
A few months back I posed a question in this blog’s left-hand column: “What issue comes up about a week before elections, then dies away immediately thereafter?”
The issue is one which trumps every other issue brought up by any candidate in this race. It has plagued me since Election 2000.
Electronic voting machines – can you trust your vote to count?
Blitzer reported, “As primaries draw near, some states are finding serious problems already with their electronic voting machines, and they're ready to give e-voting a grade of ‘F.’ "
Correspondent Carol Costello added, “You know, Wolf, you would think after all the problems we had with hanging chads in 2000 and voting machine malfunctions in 2004 and 2006, voting machines across the country would work by now. But, a few days before caucuses and primaries get under way, they're not.”
Colorado’s Secretary of State Mike Coffman, who says the machines can be shut down or corrupted with a simple magnet or even a Blackberry, said,”At the end of the day, what I think is most important is that the voters have confidence that this equipment is secure from being tampered with, and that their votes could be accurately counted.”
Well, duh.
Remember Ohio in 2004? Here’s what that state’s secretary of state, Jennifer Brunner, had to say about the machines: “They have done the job in the past with difficulty, and I could probably best analogize it to a vehicle with a bad axle, that at some point the wheels are going to fall off, and we're just going to be hopeful that in using them for one more election that we'll be able to get through.”
Just “one more election?” How about arguably the most important election in this country’s history?
OK, we’ve heard this crap for seven years now. What good does it do to give a lame, milguetoast report just days before votes are cast, then ignore the problem for another year?
Damn it! When is something going to be done about this – so that the next time you go into a voting booth and touch your favorite candidate’s name on the screen, you can know for certain who actually got your vote?
PEOPLE POWER: Contact your state election commission and your state legislator or assembleman and demand machines which yield a paper ballot as proof their innards aren’t rigged.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
It's good advice to fight this thing. But what do we say about the fact that the malfunction has WORKED in the past? This works for people. The worst thing all the people who will foster this kind of ill could see is that, in a way, it got a president elected. I mean, that is Works, with a cap W. Truth is a hard thing to let out of the bag after decades of trying to make elections fair. I do remember what Bush the Senior said at that time. Oh, he said, in six months no one will be talking about any of that.
One way to avoid the electronic machines is to get absentee ballots. I've used them for years and will again this coming election. You can always make a copy of your ballot and keep it on hand for recounts. Florida is supposed to have paper ballots again.
The e-machines are made to malfunction and to be tinkered with by those who championed the ones in office the past seven years.
If we see justice in this country, they will be sitting behind bars for all their unlawful misdeeds, which are legion. Jan wonders if we will ever see that day.
In Oregon all we have is mail-in ballots. I have forgotten how easy it is to make a malfunction in the old type of voting machines. We do have to believe, though, that the ballots are counted. There is no receipt. I really like this system because I think more people vote. But if there is a dishonesty problem--wow! it could be rampant with our mail-ins.
Eowyn: Doubts about the accuracy of electronic voting machines arose from both a disclosed memo and results which didn’t match poll indications. Congressman Dennis Kucinich uncovered a memo from the president of Diebold, one of the biggest machine providers, in which he “guaranteed” the race in 2004 for George W. Bush. For me, doubts arouse when Republican Saxby Chambliss defeated Max Cleland for a U.S. Senate seat in Georgia, despite every pre-election poll indicating Cleland would handily win. There were other races just as inexplicable, including John Thune’s defeat of Tom Daschle in South Dakota. The thing about a voiting machine with a computer inside – it most certainly can be programmed. After seven years of promising to FIX the ballot problem, neither Congress nor the majority of states has done so. I have walked away from my polling place for six years wondering if my vote counted. That’s not a good feeling, and that’s not what our Constitution guarantees.
Post a Comment