4/20/2007

Riding the black horse

(Read time: 5 minutes.)

I once worked with an old, grey-haired editor, a recovering alcoholic wise beyond even his years, who told me that since large corporate chains had taken over journalism, it had become “a whore riding a black horse.” The “black horse” in his colorful description is printer’s ink.

***

My Toronto friend David must have been reading my mind when he emailed me the thoughts of an L. A. Times columnist.

Since Don Imus lost his morning microphone, I’ve thought a lot about silenced critics of the Bush administration.

Along comes Patt Morrison’s column, “9/11’s free speech casualties,” explaining that similar thoughts about the Imus controversy “got me thinking about two other media guys - working stiffs, not multimillionaires; professional informers, not inflamers - who got fired for saying something controversial and wise.”

It’s important here to make a distinction:

* Editorials are the voice of the newspaper and carry no by-line.
* Columns are the sole opinion – the speech – of the columnist and are not attributed to the newspaper.
* Letters-to-the-editor express the opinions of readers.

Morrison writes about two award-winning newspaper columnists who were fired and even threatened for criticizing George W. Bush in the wake of 9/11. Read her column: LINK

There have been others.

* Ashleigh Banfield, the highly promoted rising star at MSNBC, who filed daily reports from Afghanistan. She criticized Bush's handling of Iraq in a college speech and was immediately fired by MSNBC.
* Phil Donahue, veteran TV host and liberal voice, lost his talk show on MSNBC.
* Bill Press lost his job as co-host of "Buchanan and Press," an MSNBC show which was canceled, it seemed to this viewer, to silence Press' liberal views and criticism of Bush - while the president’s poll figures were in the stratosphere. While Press has occasional TV appearances, Buchanan seems to have a sleeping cot at MSNBC.
* Peter Arnett, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who covered Vietnam and reported live from a Baghdad hotel for CNN during the first Gulf War, was fired by NBC, MSNBC and National Geographic at the beginning of the Iraq invasion. Arnett, who in 1997 was the first-ever television journalist to interview Osama bin Laden, had made critical remarks about the war and the political climate in the U.S. in an interview on Iraqi television. Read “Was Arnett’s Firing Fair?”, an analysis from the Poynter Institute: LINK
* Tim McCarthy, award-winning editorial writer, was fired from the Littleton, N. H., Courier for editorials criticizing Bush after 9/11.
* Jon Lieberman, Sinclair Broadcast Group’s Washington bureau chief, was fired after he publicly criticized the company’s plans to air “Stolen Honor,” a documentary aimed at discrediting 2004 presidential hopeful and Bush opponent John Kerry. Lieberman called the film "biased political propaganda, with clear intentions to sway the election." (Now in the vernacular: “Swift boating.”) Sinclair, one of the country’s largest broadcasting chains, altered the format of the film after stockholders complained.
* Dan Rather, another Bush critic, who was silenced by CBS and right-wing critics after a CBS investigation into Bush’s National Guard record. Conservatives were highly rankled by Rather's newsworthy last interview with Saddam Hussein.

I'm certain Walter Cronkite, once voted “the most trusted man in America,” would have been fired, if he were not retired. He has been a harsh critic of Bush and his Iraq policy.

And, do you know who has been the loudest and most unrelenting critic of the Bush administration’s policies foreign and domestic? Don Imus. Imus didn't just bring up an issue and comment on it: he hammered away at it day after day. Despite the reason, his voice, too, has been silenced.

The L.A. Times columnist says Bush's poll numbers are "circling the drain."
Nevertheless, there is still hestitancy among cable and network journalists to criticize him.

They prefer to couch the issues as "Democrats say, Republicans say" or "liberals say, conservatives say."

What are the media saying?

Seems the glory days of muckraking are history.

Apparently, responsible investigative journalism - at least on TV Рis pass̩.


***

UPDATE; "'Devastating' Moyers probe of press and Iraq coming," Editor and Publisher, 19 April 2007: LINK

4 comments:

airth10 said...

I was think, perhaps one reason why the media has ' dumbed down' as it has is because it is inherently liberal. Liberals over the past few years have been getting whacked by right-wingers. As a result the liberal media has coward, become demoralized and withdrawn into itself, forsaking their duty as responsible journalists. The right-wingers have also use the specter of 9/11, terrorism and patriotism as other means to subduing the liberal press. And it has worked. As a result the liberal press has censored itself. Perhaps this environment will change when this administration and is storm troopers are gone. Nevertheless, we are beginning to see signs of the liberal media reawakening. Maybe they have been re-embolden by last year's Democrat win.

airth10 said...

I was thinking again. 9/11 caused an economic jolt that many thought America and the world would never recover from. At the time some talked about the end of capitalism, free trade and globalization because of it. The world too, it was thought, would never again be secure enough so as to allow for the free movement of people.

Well, the world economically recovered from 9/11 and has even expanded in travel and trade. America and the world, thank goodness, had developed a resilience prior to 9/11 that managed to overcome such a jolt.

However, 9/11 caused another jolt, a political jolt which America has not yet recovered from. It was a jolt that poisoned the political waters in America and its diplomatic efforts abroad. It was jolt perpetrated and perpetuated by a specific political ideology, hubris and arrogance. At home it produced political divisions and incompetence that will take years to fix. Abroad, for instance, it has cause the unraveling of the good political and diplomatic achievements accomplished over the years in the Middle East. This political jolt has also been reflected in the cowering of the media, its fear of antagonizing this administration and its lack of scrutinizing Bush&Co.'s war on terrorism.

America will never totally recover from the political jolt of 9/11 until this administration is gone, when the slate is clean. There is something like 640 days to go.

Anonymous said...

As Arnold Schwarzenegger once said in a perfectly robotic ensemble, "I'll be back." Airth 10, I love what you say, but I do not agree. It is about money ("makes the world go around"). The money is so huge that it corrupts, it prevents candor; it promotes inertia. Things can't be so bad when we're making lots of money, can it? The people who report, whom we once depended on to do analysis now make lots of money, or they work very diligently to get to a position where they will make said money. They are not "whores," they are Barry Bonds, and they are Geraldo Rivera. They are not Joe Galloway, nor are they some guy who gets acid thrown in his face in Chicago. They are wealthy, and they act like it. The rest of us aren't important any more. Bless his heart, it is the "two Americas" that the young man from Carolina so eloquently placed in front of us as our biggest challenge.

airth10 said...

Well, anonymous, I like that there is a binding factor like money because reason - politics, alone doesn't do it. Material values seem to precede reason.

I always keep in mind that humans are a perverse lot, that we learn things in a backwards fashion. And if it takes money for us to learn reason, how to live together, well, it is good that we have that vehicle. Perversely, the economy has been the wedge behind which we have developed are shared and rational values.

vehicle